Employers must deal with a layered legal framework where immigration requirements, labour rules and EU mobility principles apply at the same time, and where the order of procedures is often decisive.

Cyber incidents have become part of everyday life, and for many organizations they can be just as disruptive as shutting the doors of a physical building. To respond to increasingly sophisticated attacks, the European Union has tightened the rules. The main tool is the NIS 2 Directive.

As workplace dynamics evolve, adjustments to roles, responsibilities, and conditions often become necessary. However, these changes must follow strict legal procedures to safeguard both employers and employees, ensuring compliance, transparency, and fairness.

The article examines the legal and ethical boundaries of digital employee monitoring in the context of remote work, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that respects both employer interests and employee privacy.

In force since April 30, 2025, Emergency Ordinance no. 31/2025 aims to regulate certain measures for simplifying procedures in the field of urban planning and construction, as well as accelerating investments.

The adoption of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (“AI Act”) introduces a structured regulatory framework that governs the design, deployment, and use of AI systems in the EU.

Emergency Ordinance 155/2024 on the Establishment of a Cybersecurity Framework for Networks and Information Systems in the National Civil Cyberspace

This legislative measure introduced significant tax policy changes, including the removal of the income tax exemption for IT&C employees.

The Court of International Commercial Arbitration attached to the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Romania (CCIR Court) has introduced revised arbitration rules, effective January 1, 2025. These updates aim to enhance efficiency, align with international best practices, and respond to evolving business needs.

The Romanian High Court’s binding decision of 17 June 2024 clarified that only NGOs explicitly authorized by law can administer institutional arbitration in Romania, addressing conflicting case law and excluding international arbitral institutions and chambers of commerce from its scope.